어스틴 (오스틴) 텍사스 게시판/공고 부동산 비지니스 소식
스몰 비즈니스 시작하기 최고 좋은 지역 (어스틴 4위 랭크)
김세규
Author
admin
Date
2009-02-11 19:40
Views
1697
(텍사스 어스틴 다운타운 6번가)
요즘같은 격변의 시대에 비즈니스를 시작하기 좋은 곳은 어디일까?
비즈저널의 조사에 의하면 small business(소자본 비즈니스)를 시작하기 좋은 장소로 1위 Raleigh, 2위 Charlotte가 꼽혔다.
이번 조사는 전미 100개의 도시를 대상으로 비즈니스 창출, 발전 가능성이 있는지 인구수, 종업원수, 소규모 비즈니스 성장도, 비즈니스 밀집도 등을 분석했다.
시애틀이 3위, 오스틴 4위, 그리고 보이즈(Boise, Idaho)가 5위를 차지했다.
디트로이트(Detroit)가 가장 낮은 순위였는데, 이는 쇠퇴하고 있는 자동차 산업의 영향으로 보인다.
| Rank | Metropolitan area | Small-business vitality score | Small businesses (2006) | Small businesses per 1,000 residents (2006) | Change in private-sector employment (2003-08) | Change in population (2002-07) | Population (2007) |
| 1 | Raleigh | 58.20 | 27,596 | 27.6 | 23.0% | 21.2% | 1,047,629 |
| 2 | Charlotte | 43.09 | 42,905 | 27.1 | 15.4% | 17.4% | 1,651,568 |
| 3 | Seattle | 39.40 | 96,040 | 29.4 | 15.1% | 5.9% | 3,309,347 |
| 4 | Austin | 37.26 | 36,559 | 23.9 | 21.0% | 17.9% | 1,598,161 |
| 5 | Boise, Idaho | 37.18 | 17,451 | 30.7 | 16.7% | 17.7% | 587,689 |
| 6 | Salt Lake City | 36.18 | 31,189 | 28.9 | 17.7% | 9.6% | 1,099,973 |
| 7 | Orlando | 35.33 | 56,459 | 28.3 | 18.2% | 15.6% | 2,032,496 |
| 8 | Oklahoma City | 28.95 | 31,418 | 26.7 | 10.4% | 6.4% | 1,192,989 |
| 9 | Denver | 27.03 | 72,867 | 30.2 | 9.2% | 8.1% | 2,464,866 |
| 10 | Portland, Maine | 23.14 | 17,582 | 34.4 | 3.5% | 2.4% | 513,102 |
| 11 | Portland, Ore. | 20.77 | 61,244 | 28.7 | 11.7% | 8.0% | 2,175,113 |
| 12 | Miami-Fort Lauderdale | 20.25 | 174,580 | 32.2 | 9.0% | 4.2% | 5,413,212 |
| 13 | Bridgeport-Stamford, Conn. | 19.22 | 27,965 | 31.3 | 4.1% | 0.3% | 895,015 |
| 14 | McAllen-Edinburg, Texas | 18.87 | 9,779 | 14.2 | 26.7% | 16.6% | 710,514 |
| 15 | Las Vegas | 18.52 | 39,016 | 22.0 | 20.0% | 21.1% | 1,836,333 |
| 16 | Washington | 17.44 | 137,721 | 26.2 | 8.5% | 5.8% | 5,306,565 |
| 17 | Houston | 16.65 | 114,262 | 20.8 | 16.7% | 12.8% | 5,628,101 |
| 18 | Charleston, S.C. | 16.58 | 16,202 | 26.3 | 14.6% | 11.1% | 630,100 |
| 19 | Virginia Beach-Norfolk | 16.36 | 38,012 | 22.9 | 7.8% | 3.3% | 1,658,754 |
| 20 | Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Fla. | 15.52 | 16,628 | 29.2 | 13.1% | 24.4% | 590,564 |
| 21 | Dallas-Fort Worth | 15.37 | 133,438 | 22.3 | 13.3% | 12.3% | 6,145,037 |
| 22 | Des Moines, Iowa | 14.98 | 14,447 | 27.0 | 10.3% | 9.9% | 546,599 |
| 23 | Colorado Springs | 14.20 | 16,477 | 27.4 | 5.5% | 7.6% | 609,096 |
| 24 | San Antonio | 13.28 | 38,778 | 20.0 | 14.8% | 11.9% | 1,990,675 |
| 25 | Jacksonville | 12.25 | 34,302 | 26.8 | 11.1% | 10.9% | 1,300,823 |
| 26 | Omaha | 11.94 | 21,325 | 26.0 | 5.2% | 6.0% | 829,890 |
| 27 | Richmond | 10.22 | 31,065 | 26.0 | 8.8% | 7.8% | 1,212,977 |
| 28 | Greenville, S.C. | 9.66 | 14,912 | 24.8 | 10.3% | 7.2% | 613,828 |
| 29 | Greensboro | 8.87 | 18,034 | 26.3 | 6.9% | 6.3% | 698,497 |
| 30 | Little Rock, Ark. | 8.85 | 17,172 | 26.1 | 7.6% | 7.0% | 666,401 |
| 31 | Atlanta | 8.75 | 130,550 | 25.5 | 8.7% | 15.8% | 5,278,904 |
| 32 | Madison, Wis. | 8.34 | 15,153 | 27.7 | 7.0% | 6.9% | 555,626 |
| 33 | Nashville | 8.21 | 36,237 | 24.4 | 10.4% | 11.5% | 1,521,437 |
| 34 | Indianapolis | 7.31 | 42,137 | 25.2 | 6.4% | 7.4% | 1,695,037 |
| 35 | New York City | 6.77 | 527,475 | 28.1 | 4.9% | 1.3% | 18,815,988 |
| 36 | Boston | 6.52 | 122,042 | 27.3 | 4.7% | 0.6% | 4,482,857 |
| 37 | Ogden, Utah | 6.43 | 11,116 | 22.1 | 15.0% | 12.2% | 518,349 |
| 38 | New Orleans | 6.31 | 28,061 | 28.3 | -11.5% | -21.4% | 1,030,363 |
| 39 | Tulsa | 6.16 | 23,851 | 26.7 | 10.0% | 3.5% | 905,755 |
| 40 | Minneapolis-St. Paul | 5.24 | 90,905 | 28.7 | 4.5% | 5.0% | 3,208,212 |
| 41 | Baltimore | 5.12 | 65,972 | 24.8 | 7.5% | 2.8% | 2,668,056 |
| 42 | Hartford | 4.58 | 29,453 | 24.9 | 6.5% | 1.9% | 1,189,113 |
| 43 | Palm Bay-Melbourne, Fla. | 2.00 | 13,687 | 25.7 | 6.3% | 8.4% | 536,161 |
| 44 | Bradenton-Sarasota, Fla. | 1.36 | 20,930 | 30.8 | 7.9% | 11.1% | 687,181 |
| 45 | Baton Rouge, La. | 1.21 | 16,876 | 22.1 | 11.7% | 7.9% | 770,037 |
| 46 | Phoenix | 1.00 | 87,818 | 21.7 | 16.0% | 19.5% | 4,179,427 |
| 47 | San Diego | 0.86 | 76,417 | 25.9 | 5.6% | 2.3% | 2,974,859 |
| 48 | San Francisco-Oakland | 0.66 | 118,049 | 28.4 | 3.0% | 0.9% | 4,203,898 |
| 49 | Albuquerque | 0.58 | 18,957 | 23.2 | 8.5% | 10.8% | 835,120 |
| 50 | San Jose | -0.90 | 44,928 | 25.3 | 5.9% | 3.9% | 1,803,643 |
| 51 | Daytona Beach, Fla. | -1.27 | 12,997 | 26.2 | 6.4% | 9.1% | 500,413 |
| 52 | Harrisburg, Pa. | -2.22 | 13,138 | 25.0 | 4.8% | 3.0% | 528,892 |
| 53 | Tampa-St. Petersburg | -2.25 | 71,088 | 26.4 | 8.0% | 9.6% | 2,723,949 |
| 54 | Knoxville, Tenn. | -3.00 | 16,116 | 24.0 | 7.8% | 7.7% | 681,525 |
| 55 | Bakersfield, Calif. | -3.53 | 11,976 | 15.5 | 18.1% | 14.5% | 790,710 |
| 56 | Poughkeepsie, N.Y. | -3.71 | 16,454 | 24.7 | 3.1% | 4.3% | 669,915 |
| 57 | Birmingham | -3.90 | 26,141 | 23.8 | 5.2% | 4.1% | 1,108,210 |
| 58 | Columbus | -4.18 | 39,480 | 22.8 | 4.9% | 5.7% | 1,754,337 |
| 59 | Columbia, S.C. | -4.31 | 16,933 | 24.1 | 9.8% | 7.9% | 716,030 |
| 60 | Chicago | -4.42 | 234,989 | 24.8 | 3.8% | 2.8% | 9,524,673 |
| 61 | Albany | -6.25 | 20,564 | 24.2 | 2.7% | 2.4% | 853,358 |
| 62 | Honolulu | -6.39 | 21,616 | 23.8 | 9.1% | 2.5% | 905,601 |
| 63 | Philadelphia | -6.82 | 145,341 | 25.0 | 3.5% | 1.7% | 5,827,962 |
| 64 | Los Angeles | -6.87 | 331,140 | 25.7 | 3.6% | 1.5% | 12,875,587 |
| 65 | Kansas City | -7.25 | 51,055 | 26.0 | 5.6% | 5.2% | 1,985,429 |
| 66 | Pittsburgh | -7.60 | 59,633 | 25.2 | 2.3% | -2.3% | 2,355,712 |
| 67 | Jackson, Miss. | -8.53 | 12,580 | 23.7 | 4.6% | 5.8% | 534,047 |
| 68 | Allentown-Bethlehem, Pa. | -8.69 | 18,388 | 23.1 | 5.4% | 6.3% | 803,844 |
| 69 | Louisville | -8.79 | 29,548 | 24.2 | 4.9% | 4.5% | 1,233,735 |
| 70 | Wichita, Kans. | -9.77 | 14,430 | 24.5 | 8.4% | 3.0% | 596,452 |
| 71 | El Paso, Texas | -10.62 | 12,554 | 17.3 | 8.5% | 6.4% | 734,669 |
| 72 | New Haven, Conn. | -12.22 | 20,258 | 24.0 | 4.0% | 1.5% | 845,494 |
| 73 | Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, Pa. | -12.88 | 13,392 | 24.4 | 3.6% | -0.6% | 549,430 |
| 74 | Chattanooga, Tenn. | -13.30 | 11,210 | 22.0 | 6.3% | 5.5% | 514,568 |
| 75 | Syracuse, N.Y. | -13.68 | 15,247 | 23.6 | 2.5% | -0.7% | 645,293 |
| 76 | St. Louis | -13.93 | 70,200 | 25.1 | 2.3% | 2.5% | 2,803,707 |
| 77 | Milwaukee | -14.36 | 39,157 | 25.4 | 3.0% | 1.6% | 1,544,398 |
| 78 | Sacramento | -14.71 | 45,696 | 22.2 | 5.9% | 8.6% | 2,091,120 |
| 79 | Akron, Ohio | -15.03 | 17,027 | 24.3 | 4.3% | -0.1% | 699,356 |
| 80 | Grand Rapids | -15.11 | 18,541 | 24.0 | 2.0% | 2.7% | 776,742 |
| 81 | Lakeland, Fla. | -16.50 | 11,388 | 20.4 | 12.0% | 15.3% | 574,746 |
| 82 | Cincinnati | -18.68 | 46,880 | 22.1 | 3.2% | 4.1% | 2,133,678 |
| 83 | Cleveland | -18.78 | 54,463 | 25.9 | -1.0% | -2.1% | 2,096,471 |
| 84 | Buffalo | -19.26 | 26,470 | 23.4 | 0.6% | -2.6% | 1,128,183 |
| 85 | Stockton, Calif. | -19.80 | 11,150 | 16.8 | 8.1% | 10.1% | 670,990 |
| 86 | Youngstown, Ohio | -19.87 | 13,493 | 23.4 | -0.6% | -3.9% | 570,704 |
| 87 | Augusta, Ga. | -21.18 | 10,525 | 20.1 | 2.4% | 4.3% | 528,519 |
| 88 | Fresno, Calif. | -22.27 | 15,987 | 18.1 | 8.9% | 8.2% | 899,348 |
| 89 | Providence | -22.38 | 42,772 | 26.7 | -1.0% | -0.5% | 1,600,856 |
| 90 | Tucson | -23.70 | 20,568 | 21.7 | 8.6% | 10.2% | 967,089 |
| 91 | Oxnard-Thousand Oaks, Calif. | -24.08 | 19,179 | 24.2 | 2.6% | 2.6% | 798,364 |
| 92 | Memphis | -24.29 | 25,934 | 20.4 | 4.3% | 4.6% | 1,280,533 |
| 93 | Worcester, Mass. | -25.25 | 18,024 | 23.1 | 1.0% | 1.8% | 781,352 |
| 94 | Springfield, Mass. | -25.57 | 15,160 | 22.2 | 0.9% | -0.0% | 682,657 |
| 95 | Riverside-San Bernardino, Calif. | -27.07 | 64,678 | 16.2 | 14.3% | 16.9% | 4,081,371 |
| 96 | Rochester, N.Y. | -27.97 | 22,970 | 22.3 | 0.1% | -0.8% | 1,030,495 |
| 97 | Dayton | -32.57 | 18,238 | 21.8 | -4.2% | -1.0% | 835,537 |
| 98 | Modesto, Calif. | -34.41 | 8,923 | 17.6 | 2.5% | 6.9% | 511,263 |
| 99 | Toledo, Ohio | -38.09 | 15,229 | 23.3 | -2.5% | -1.2% | 650,955 |
| 100 | Detroit | -49.73 | 102,035 | 22.7 | -7.5% | -0.5% | 4,467,592 |
| SOURCE: bizjournals- February 2, 2009 | |||||||
어스틴 김세규 부동산
Total 53
| Number | Thumbnail | Title | Author | Date | Votes | Views |
| 53 |
|
admin
|
2016.10.04
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2907
|
admin | 2016.10.04 | 0 | 2907 |
| 52 |
|
admin
|
2016.10.01
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2264
|
admin | 2016.10.01 | 0 | 2264 |
| 51 |
|
admin
|
2016.09.27
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2861
|
admin | 2016.09.27 | 0 | 2861 |
| 50 |
|
admin
|
2014.02.19
|
Votes 0
|
Views 3042
|
admin | 2014.02.19 | 0 | 3042 |
| 49 |
어스틴 텍사스 지역 최고 부자 동네 우편번호 순위
admin
|
2014.02.18
|
Votes 0
|
Views 3992
|
admin | 2014.02.18 | 0 | 3992 | |
| 48 |
2013년 각종 잡지 및 경제순위 선정 어스틴 Top 리스트
admin
|
2014.02.18
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2603
|
admin | 2014.02.18 | 0 | 2603 | |
| 47 |
어스틴 지역 경제 전문가 Angelou의 2014/2015 어스틴 경제 전망
admin
|
2014.02.18
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2059
|
admin | 2014.02.18 | 0 | 2059 | |
| 46 |
|
admin
|
2014.02.18
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2327
|
admin | 2014.02.18 | 0 | 2327 |
| 45 |
|
admin
|
2014.02.18
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2134
|
admin | 2014.02.18 | 0 | 2134 |
| 44 |
|
admin
|
2014.02.18
|
Votes 0
|
Views 3479
|
admin | 2014.02.18 | 0 | 3479 |
| 43 |
|
admin
|
2014.02.18
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2212
|
admin | 2014.02.18 | 0 | 2212 |
| 42 |
2013년, 2014년 오스틴 경제 전망: 2014년까지 계속 좋아 2012/12/14
admin
|
2014.02.18
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2254
|
admin | 2014.02.18 | 0 | 2254 | |
| 41 |
2012년 어스틴 지역 경제 전망 'fantastic' 2012/02/27
admin
|
2014.02.18
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2194
|
admin | 2014.02.18 | 0 | 2194 | |
| 40 |
비지니스 위크 선정, 어스틴 전미에서 2번째로 강한 경제도시 2009/10/29
admin
|
2014.02.17
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2019
|
admin | 2014.02.17 | 0 | 2019 | |
| 39 |
보브지선정: 어스틴 스몰 비지니스 시작하기 최고의 도시 2009/10/15
admin
|
2014.02.17
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2338
|
admin | 2014.02.17 | 0 | 2338 | |
| 38 |
보브지, 어스틴 전미에서 가장 빠른 경제회복 기대
admin
|
2009.07.28
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2594
|
admin | 2009.07.28 | 0 | 2594 | |
| 37 |
어스틴 상업용 부동산 매물 은행 차압 급상승
admin
|
2009.07.15
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2340
|
admin | 2009.07.15 | 0 | 2340 | |
| 36 |
어스틴 지역 기반 (Foundation) 문제가 가장 많은 동네는?
admin
|
2009.06.04
|
Votes 0
|
Views 3079
|
admin | 2009.06.04 | 0 | 3079 | |
| 35 |
어스틴, 2025년에 인구 2백7십만명 예상 (전미에서 5번째로 빠르게 인구성장)
admin
|
2009.06.04
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2798
|
admin | 2009.06.04 | 0 | 2798 | |
| 34 |
보브지, 최고의 할인 도시 어스틴 선정(best bargain city)
admin
|
2009.05.26
|
Votes 0
|
Views 2446
|
admin | 2009.05.26 | 0 | 2446 |